Tribunals and Commissions(1996) 08 NCDRC CK 0032

S.V.R. ESTATE DEVELOPERS vs B.VEERABHADRADU

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission · Decided on 30 August 1996 · Citation: 1996 3 CPJ 419

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.Venkatarami Reddy , J.Ananda Lakshmi , K.Ranga Raos J.
RESULT
Revision partly allowed

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 219 words
1.

THIS revision is filed by the opposite party in CD 2113/95 District Forum, Hyderabad questioning the order of the District Forum passed in IA 529/95 whereby it punished the opposite party with imprisonment for a period of three months and fine of Rs. 6,000/- or in default of payment thereof further imprisonment for a period of three months. Pending the revision the State Commission passed an order on 8.3.96 granting interim stay of arrest on condition that the petitioner deposits an amount of Rs. 6,000/- being the fine to the credit of IA 529/95 in CD 2113/93. It is represented that the said amount was deposited as directed by the State Commission. A memo is filed signed by the Counsel for the petitioner and the respondent/complainant who is present in Court stating that the petitioner in this revision petition paid the entire decretal amount of Rs. 1,06,895/- (Rupees One lakh, six thousand and eight hundred and ninety-five only) with interest including Rs. 5,000/- deposited before the District Forum to the complainant. In these circumstances, since the petitioner paid the fine of Rs. 6,000/-, which was imposed by the District Forum, we consider it appropriate to set aside the order of imprisonment. The revision is allowed in part. There shall be no order as to costs. Revision partly allowed.