Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2023) 10 NCLT CK 0004

Sushma Anand Jain vs Nirmal Lifestyle Limited

National Company Law Tribunal · Decided on 3 October 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Lakshmi Gurung, Member (J) · Charanjeet Singh Gulati, Member (T)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
I.A. 4369 Of 2023 In C.P.(IB)-176(MB) Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 238 words

Lakshmi Gurung, Member Judicial

I.A. 4369/2023

1.

None appeared for the Applicant. Adv. Hamd Bhal i/b Junarkar G Associates appearing for the Original Petitioner, Adv. Rishab Jain appearing for the Corporate Debtor and Adv. Sonam Mhotre appearing for the Respondent No.16 are present.

2.

This is an application filed by the Applicant, Delight City of Joy Co-Operative Housing Society Limited seeking following reliefs:

a. The moratorium under section 14 of the IBC 2016 shall not apply to the property under consideration for ‘deemed conveyance’.

b. Notwithstanding commencement of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, the respondent no.3 is free to allow and grant ‘deemed conveyance’ to the applicant if he finds it otherwise appropriate.

c. The property under consideration, shall not form part of disposable asset of the company undergoing the resolution process.

3.

However, when the matter was called, nobody appeared on behalf of the Applicant. It is noticed from the order of this Adjudicating Authority dated 12.04.2023 that an application filed under Section 12A for withdrawal of the CIRP was allowed and the main Company Petition bearing C.P.(IB)-176(MB)/2020 was disposed of.

4.

Therefore, the above prayer sought by the applicant seeking that moratorium should not be applied to the property under consideration appears to be infructuous as there is no CIRP and consequently no moratorium is going on against the Corporate Debtor.

5.

In view of the above, the above I.A. 4369/2023 is disposed of as infructuous.