High CourtsDivision Bench(2026) 09 BOM CK 4030

Sushila Namdeo Malge & Ors. vs The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.

Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench · Decided on 23 September 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Nitin B. Suryawanshi, J · Abasaheb D. Shinde, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 12222 of 2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 75 words

ORDER

i)

The Writ Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clauses ‘B’ and ‘C’.

ii)The respondents shall undertake the exercise of restoration of the administrative sanction of the development works to the extent of petitioners’ villages within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of reciept of this order.

iii) Rule is made absolute in the above terms.

( ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. ) ( NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI , J. ) vsj..