Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2023) 04 CAT CK 0611

Sushil Kumar Mishra vs Union Of India & Ors.

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 15 April 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjiv Kumar, Member (A)
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No. 19 of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 74 words

O R D E R

None present for the applicant even in the revised call. Shri Rajni Kant Rai, learned counsel for the respondents is present.

2.

None has appeared on behalf of the applicant even in the revised call. Also, there is no request on behalf of the applicant’s counsel for adjournment. It is quite apparent that the applicant has lost interest in pursuing the matter. Accordingly OA is dismissed in non- prosecution.