High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 07 SHI CK 0043

Sushil Kumar vs HRTC & Anr

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 12 July 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 4378 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 299 words

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J

CMP No.8443/2023

1.

For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and disposed of.

CWP No.4378/2020

With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up for final disposal.

2.

This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive relief:-

“(I) That writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued, directing the respondents to pay extra wages to the petitioner for the extra work, which he has done in the respondent corporation, by treating his approximately 420 days compensatory leaves/weekly/Sunday rests in his credit as overtime as per Section 26 and other provisions of the Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961.”

During hearing of the case, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue raised in the petition is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 1910/2021 (Rattan Lal Vs. Himachal Road Transport Corporation & Ors.) decided on 16.06.2021. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the petitioner would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the case of the petitioner, in light of the law laid down in the aforesaid judgment, in a time bound manner. Prayer is not opposed by learned counsel for the respondents.

3.

In view of the stand taken by learned counsel for the parties, but without going into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the case of the petitioner, in accordance with law and in light of the aforesaid judgment within a period of four weeks by passing a reasoned order, which shall be communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.