Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2010) 10 SC CK 0019

Surjeet Singh and Another vs Hushmukh Mehta and Others

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 26 October 2010

HON’BLE JUDGES
Markandey Katju, J · Gyan Sudha Misra, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 296 of 2005

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 221 words
1.

Heard Learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

This Appeal has been filed against the order dated 22.10.2003 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Jabalpur Madhya Pradesh in First Appeal No. 228 of 203.

3.

The facts of the case have already been set out in the impugned judgment of the High Court and hence we are not repeating the same here.

4.

In the impugned judgment, the High Court has held that the Plaintiff (appellant herein) is entitled to a sum of Rs 1,50,000/- but the High Court has said that since no consequential relief has been prayed for, relief cannot be granted.

5.

We have perused the plaint in the case and we are of the opinion that consequential relief has been prayed for. This is evident from relief (1) mentioned in the plaint. That relief states that the Plaintiff is entitled to get Rs. 1,50,000/- as per paragraph 7 of the agreement to sell. In our opinion the relief should not be construed in a hypertechnical manner.

6.

In the circumstances, the appeal is allowed, impugned judgments of the High Court and of the A.D.J. are set aside and the decree is passed to the extent that the appellant herein is entitled to a sum of Rs. 1,50,000/- to be recovered from the Defendant-Respondent. No costs.