High CourtsDivision Bench(1913) 01 CAL CK 0019

Surendra Nath Mitra and Others vs Upendra Nath Bhatta

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 3 January 1913 · Citation: 18 Ind. Cas. 495

HON’BLE JUDGES
Richardson, J · Cecil Brett, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 87 words
1.

No one appearing to oppose this Rule, we think that it should be made absolute. The claim of the father of the petitioners was for rent. The fact that the claim was allowed and a decree for rent was obtained does not appear to us to have altered the character of the original debt which was one for rent. We, therefore, make the Rule absolute, set aside the order of the Munsif respecting the application and direct that the amount claimed be paid to the petitioners.