High CourtsSingle Bench(2008) 05 AHC CK 0012

Surendra Kumar Srivastava and Others vs State of U.P. and Others

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 5 May 2008 · Citation: (2008) 117 FLR 1063 : (2008) 2 UPLBEC 80

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bharati Sapru, J
RESULT
Allowed

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 263 words

Bharati Sapru, J.—The petitioners are aggrieved by an order dated 22.8.1983, which is an order passed by the Accounts Officer by which their salaries were stopped. The petitioners'' case is that they were validly appointed teachers in the Azad Uchchatar Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Runuwan Pokharbhinda, Gorakhpur.

It is their contention that the posts had been created validly and they had been appointed validly under the orders of the District Inspector of Schools. Upon receiving a complaint from a committee of management the Director of Education at Allahabad issued a letter on 6.4.1983 directing that the salary should only be paid after scrutiny and investigation of the case and, therefore, their salaries were stopped.

3.

A supplementary counter affidavit has been filed by the State in which it has been stated that the arrears have also been paid to the petitioners after the scrutiny and investigation was over.

4.

These facts are stated in the supplementary counter affidavit filed by Sri Awadh Bihari Chaubey dated 27.9.1983. Therefore, it becomes clear that upon conclusion of the enquiry as directed by the Director of Education it has been found that the petitioners were validly'' appointed teachers in the institution in question and their salary as well as arrears have all been released. The petitioners having worked continuously since the year 1980 and even they are continuing in service, the impugned order dated 22.8.1983 deserves to be set aside.

5.

This writ petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 22.8.1983 is set aside. The petitioners will continue in service as before and will continue to receive their salaries.