High CourtsSingle Bench(2012) 08 DEL CK 0144

Suraj Bhan and Another vs Dharampal Singh and Others

Delhi High Court · Decided on 3 August 2012

HON’BLE JUDGES
G.P. Mittal, J
CASE NUMBER
MAC. APP. 473 of 2012

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 412 words

G.P. Mittal, J.—The Appeal is for enhancement of compensation of Rs. 1,67,280/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(the Claims Tribunal) for the death of Rajender who died in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 25.09.2008. A petition u/s 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act (the Act) was preferred by the Appellants claiming a compensation. It is admitted by the counsel for the parties that in a Petition u/s 163A of the Act, a compensation has to be awarded strictly as per the structured formula given in Schedule II to the Act. This Court in ''Anarkali & Anr. v. Raj Kumar & Anr.'' (MAC APP. 341/2012) decided on 11.04.2012 while relying on The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. etc. Vs. Hansrajbhai V.Kodala and Others etc. etc., , Deepal Girishbhai Soni and Others Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Baroda, and The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Meena Variyal and Others, held that in a Petition u/s 163A of the Act, there is a cap of Rs. 40,000/- on the income and the compensation for non-pecuniary damages has also to be in consonance with the Second Schedule. The loss of dependency thus comes to Rs. 4,53,333/- ( Rs. 40,000/- x 2/3 x 17).

2.

The Appellants are further entitled to Rs. 2,000/- towards loss to estate and Rs. 2,500/- towards funeral expenses.

3.

The Claims Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs. 7,280/- towards medical treatment of the deceased till he succumbed to his injuries which is not disputed. It is, therefore, maintained. Thus, the overall compensation comes to Rs. 4,65,113/-.

4.

The enhanced compensation of Rs. 2,97,833/- shall carry interest @ 7.5% per annum and shall be equally shared between the Appellants. 70% of the enhanced compensation shall be kept in Fixed Deposit for a period of two years, four years, six years and eight years on which the Appellants would be entitled to quarterly interest. Rest 30% shall be released on deposit.

5.

The Respondent No. 3 ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. is directed to deposit the enhanced amount of Rs. 2,97,833/- along with interest in the name of the Appellants with State Bank of India, Saket Court Branch within six weeks.

6.

A copy of the order be sent to the Manager, State Bank of India, Saket Court Branch.

7.

A copy of the order be sent to the concerned Claims Tribunal for information

8.

The Appeal is allowed in above terms.

9.

Pending Applications stand disposed of. No costs.