AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Shiv Narayan Dhingra, J.—This arbitration petition has been made u/s 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by the petitioner
company relying on a consignee agreement, attached as annexure A-2 with the application. It is stated that the consignee agreement contains an
agreement clause for reference of dispute between the Petitioner Company and respondent to an Arbitrator. The petitioner has raised a claim of
sum of Rs. 3,13,205/- against the respondent.
A perusal of consignee agreement shows that the agreement is between Supreme Electronics entered through its partner Mrs. Manmeet
Chaudhry and M/s Streamline Car Decorators. There is no consignee agreement between Petitioner Company and the respondent. A perusal of
the application does not show how the petitioner has relied upon this consignee agreement between Supreme Electronics and the respondent for
settlement of arbitration dispute between the petitioner and the respondent. The application also does not disclose that identity of Supreme
Electronics had merged with the Petitioner Company at any point of time. Since, there is no arbitration agreement between the parties no dispute
can be referred u/s 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to the Arbitrator. The petition is liable to be dismissed and is hereby
dismissed.