High CourtsDivision Bench(1993) 08 DEL CK 0036

Sunita Sood vs Lt. Governor and Others

Delhi High Court · Decided on 10 August 1993 · Citation: (1994) 54 DLT 661

HON’BLE JUDGES
Y.K. Sabharwal, J · R.L. Gupta, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Writ Appeal No. 401 of 1993

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 179 words

Y.K. Sabharwal, J.

(1) Rule D.B.Learned Counsel for the State is unable to state that the complaint does not disclose commission of cognizable offence. The law is well settled that when a complaint is made or information is given to the police showing commission of cognizable offence. It is the statutory duty of the police register the First Information Report as required by Section 154 of Code of Criminal Procedure. The decision of the Supreme Court in Mohan Pandey and Another v. Smt. Usha Rani Rajgaria and Others, Jt 1992 (4) Sc ''A2'' relied upon by Mr. Sharma has no applicability on the question of the statutory, duty of the police to register Fir u/s 154 of the Code. At this stage, there is no material on the record to direct the investigation to be conducted by the Police Station other then the Police Station within whose jurisdiction the case falls. The rule is accordingly made absolute and the respondents are directed to register the Fir forthwith and proceed to investigate it inaccordance with law. Petition stands disposed of.