High CourtsSingle Bench(2012) 09 DEL CK 0214

Sunita and Others vs Pawan Kumar and Others

Delhi High Court · Decided on 10 September 2012

HON’BLE JUDGES
G.P. Mittal, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
MAC. App. 544 of 2004

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 379 words

G.P. Mittal, J.—The Appeal is for enhancement of compensation of Rs. 7,78,000/-awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the

Claims Tribunal) in favour of the Appellants for the death of Promod Kumar who died in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 15.07.1996.

The deceased was working as a driver in Summerville School, Noida (U.P.). At the time of the accident he was getting a salary of Rs. 3,016/- per

month which was retrospectively revised to Rs. 4,000/- per month from 01.01.1996 on account of implementation of the 5th Pay Commission.

2.

It is proved from PW2''s testimony that the deceased was a confirmed employee with the Summerville School and was getting increments. Thus,

the Appellants were entitled to an addition of 50% towards future prospects(as was granted by the Claims Tribunal). There were six dependents.

The deduction on personal and living expenses has to be 1/4th instead of 1/3rd made by the Claims Tribunal.

3.

The loss of dependency thus comes to Rs. 9,18,000/- ( Rs. 4,000/- + 50% x 12 x 3/4 x 17).

4.

Keeping in view that the accident occurred in 1996, I would further award a sum of Rs. 15,000/- towards loss of love and affection and Rs.

5,000/- each towards loss of consortium, loss to estate and funeral expenses.

5.

The overall compensation is thus enhanced by Rs. 1,70,000/- which shall carry interest @ 7.5% from the date of the filing of the Petition till its

payment. 75% of the enhanced compensation shall enure for the benefit of the First Appellant(the deceased''s widow) and 25% for the benefit of

the Appellant No. 6 Smt. Shanti (the deceased''s mother). 80% of the compensation payable to the First Appellant shall be held in fixed deposit

for a period of two years, four years, six years and eight years in equal proportion. Rest shall be released to her. The compensation payable to the

Appellant No. 6 shall be released on deposit.

6.

The Respondent No. 3 National Insurance Company Ltd. is directed to deposit the enhanced compensation of Rs. 1,70,000/- along with

interest in the name of the Appellants No. 1 and 6(Claimants) with UCO Bank, Delhi High Court Branch within six weeks.

7.

The Appeal is allowed in above terms. Pending Applications stand disposed of.