High CourtsSingle Bench(2025) 09 RAJ CK 0683

Ramnarayan @ Gangaram vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench · Decided on 26 September 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sameer Jain, J
RESULT
Disposed of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10929 Of 2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 508 words

Ashok Kumar Jain, J

1.

The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Ramnarayan @ Gangaram S/o Ramchandra, seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No. 330/2025 dated 22.07.2025 registered at P.S. Bhawani Mandi, District Jhalawar for the offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 352, 110 and 3(5) of BNS.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant, has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant-accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. The applicant does not have any criminal antecedents. He also submits that the applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time.

3.

Learned counsel for applicant-accused submitted that injury number 1 upon injured Ramratan is grievous in nature and attributed to Ramchandra and not to present petitioner. He submits that there was property dispute and both the parties belong to same family. He submits that due to Navaratra and Vijayadashmi Festival and for celebrating with family members, the applicant may be enlarged on bail.

4.

Learned counsel for petitioner further submits that grievous injury is attributed and assigned to Ramchandra and not on present petitioner. He further submitted that the petitioner accused is young man who is in custody since his arrest on 03.08.2025 and police has already filed charge-sheet

5.

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications and submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant-accused.

6.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties.

7.

Having considered the submissions advanced on behalf of both parties and upon perusal of the material available on record, the Court finds that the grounds raised in support of the bail application, coupled with other facts such as absence of any apprehension regarding absconding of applicant-accused, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses, it is justified to grant of bail.

8.

Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant-accused Ramnarayan @ Gangaram S/o Ramchandra, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail with condition that applicant would furnish a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner.

(ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law.

(iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court.

(iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicants-accused shall be liable to be canceled.

9.

The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail.