High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 05 DEL CK 0237

SUMAN DEVI & ORS vs MAHABIR SINGH & ORS

Delhi High Court · Decided on 18 May 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. SINGH
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
RFA 321 OF 2016

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

106 paragraphs · 2,177 words

Prathiba M. Singh, J.

1.

The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 13th January, 2016 in a suit for permanent injunction and recovery of

rent/rendition of accounts filed by the Appellants/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, “Plaintiffsâ€​) by which the suit filed by them was dismissed.

2.

The background of the case is that the Appellant No.1/Plaintiff No.1 (hereinafter, “Smt. Suman Deviâ€), Mrs. Suman Devi is the wife of Late

Shri Rambir Singh. She has two children i.e., Kumari Nisha and Master Digvijay Singh, Appellant/Plaintiff No2 (hereinafter, “Kumari Nishaâ€) &

Appellant/Plaintiff No.3 (hereinafter, “Master Digvijayâ€) respectively, both of whom were minors at the time when the subject suit was instituted.

Currently Kumari Nisha is 18 years old and Master Digvijay is 12 years old. The 10th standard mark sheet of Kumari Nisha, produced today showing

her date of birth as 12th October, 1998 is taken on record. Late Shri Rambir Singh had executed a Will dated 8th May, 2013 by which he had

bequeathed his property in the following terms:- “That the Testator declare that after my death my entire property (which is transfer through

Family G.P.A in the name of my elder brother Sh. Mahabir Singh on dated) shall lookafter by my elder brother Sh. Mahabir Singh till the date of

getting maturity age 21 yrs. by my son name Digvijay Singh @Deepu and after getting maturity age of my son, Sh. Mahabir Singh shall not get any

right in my property in any way and in any manner. My wife shall not claim in my above said property in any manner. My wife shall not claim in my

above said property in any manner or by using any way or means. That after my death rental income of my builtup property land area measuring 150

sq. yds., i.e. 125.41 sq. mtrs., out of khasra no. 587/478/96, bearing property no.c-43/4, consisting whatsoever thereon and with the right to construct

upto last storey, situated at village maujpur, in the abadi of mohan puri, maujpur, illaqa shahdara, delhi- 110053 shall be collected by my elder brother

Sh. Mahabir Singh & my wife shall not claim/receive my rental income of my property detailed given above. That my other legal heirs, successors,

and other legal representatives shall have no right or interest in the concerning of the above said property and no one shall raise any objection in

respect of this regard then the same shall be considered as null and void and ineffective before the court of law and biradari panchayat.â€​

3.

As per the said Will, the testator had appointed his brother Shri Mahabir Singh â€" Respondent No. 1/Defendant No.1 (hereinafter, “Shri

Mahabir Singhâ€), to take care of all his properties and to collect rent from House No.C-43/3, Ground Floor, Mohanpuri Village Maujpur, Delhi-

110053 (hereinafter, “suit propertyâ€). It was categorically mentioned in the said Will that Mrs. Suman Devi would have no claims in the suit

property. After the dismissal of the suit, the present appeal was preferred by all the three Plaintiffs.

4.

This Court had restrained the tenants from paying rent to Shri Mahabir Singh, vide order dated 16th May, 2016. Thereafter, affidavits were called

for from the tenants and on 27th February, 2018, the following order was passed:-

“CM APPLs. 45788/2016, 17285/2017

Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 are directed to deposit the rent w.e.f. 16th May, 2016 till date within 8 weeks, with the Registrar General of this Court. The

amount on being deposited shall be kept in a fixed deposit. Applications are disposed of.

CM APPL. 20414/2017

By this application, the Appellant seeks impleadment Mr. Ajaz and Mr. Santosh Pathak who are the tenants in the property. Advance copy of the

application was served long back and notice was also issued in this application on 29th May, 2017. The application is accompanied with photographs of

the two shops. They are impleaded as Respondent Nos.6 and 7 in the appeal. The Respondent shall file an affidavit stating as to when they were

inducted in the suit premises and how much rent they are paying. Application stands disposed of.

CM APPL. 45041/2016

This is an application for placing on record the additional documents including the Plaint and written statement in the suit filed by the Appellant

challenging the Will. The said documents are taken on record. However effect of the same in the final decision of the appeal will be considered at the

final stage.

Application is disposed of.

CM APPL. 20791/2017

Respondent No.1 has been appointed as the Guardian of the properties of the Late Sh. Rambir Singh. The rent being earned from the said property

has now been directed to be deposited in this court. The Respondent No.1 shall also deposit the rent which is now being collected from Respondent

Nos.6 and 7. All the deposits shall be made within 8 weeks. The Respondent No.1 submits that he has no intention of selling the suit property. The

said statement is taken on record. However, the same does not bar the Respondent No.1 from renting out the property and depositing the rent in this

court.

Application stands disposed of.

RFA 321/2016

In this case, the Appellant No.1, is the Bhabhi of Respondent No.1, Appellant Nos. 2 and 3, the Nephews of Respondent No.1. Appellant No.1â€s

husband was the real brother of Respondent No.1. As per the Will dated 8th May, 2013 which was registered, the Appellant No.1â€s husband, had

bequeathed his property in the following terms:

“That the Testator declare that after my death my entire property (which is transfer through Family G.P.A in the name of my elder brother Sh.

Mahabir Singh on dated) shall lookafter by my elder brother Sh. Mahabir Singh till the date of getting maturity age 21 yrs. by my son name Digvijay

Singh @ Deepu and after getting maturity age of my son, Sh. Mahabir Singh shall not get any right in my property in any way and in any manner.

My wife shall not claim in my above said property in any manner or by using any way or means.†Thus it appears that the Appellant No.1 i.e. wife

was not entitled to the property of her husband as per the bequest. The Appellant No.3, Mr. Digvijay Singh, the son of the testator is stated to be still

minor. Considering the fact that the rent amounts have been directed to be deposited in the court, it is deemed appropriate that parties are directed to

be present in court on the next date. The Appellantâ€s counsel submits that no money is being paid from the rental income to the Appellant Nos.2 and

3.

It is submitted on behalf of Respondent No.1 submits that he is ready and willing to pay the amounts which are required for the Appellant Nos. 2

and 3's education and maintenance. He further admits that he is merely a guardian of the property till Appellant no.3 attains the age of 18 years. The

Respondent No.1 further submits that the Appellant no.1 has now filed a suit challenging the Will post the impugned judgment of the Trial Court. The

Appellant No.1 is directed to file the order sheet of the said suit before the next date of hearing. Relist on 15th March, 2018.

Appellant and Respondent No.1 to appear on the next date.â€​

5.

Since the said date, the matter has been listed from time to time before this Court. On 21st March, 2018, a direction was passed that since Kumari

Nisha and Master Digvijay, who are both children, needed money for their maintenance and their education, Rs.25,000/- each, be deposited in their

bank accounts by Shri Mahabir Singh. The said deposits were made. Thereafter, Shri Mahabir Singh has also deposited the various amounts being

collected from the tenants. A total sum of Rs.5,17,000/- has been deposited by Shri Mahabir Singh with the Registrar General of this Court.

6.

In the interest of Kumari Nisha and Master Digvijay i.e. the children, and to ensure that they are adequately provided for, till Master Digvijay

attains majority, the parties i.e. Kumari Nisha and Master Digvijay through their mother, Smt. Suman Devi, and Smt. Suman Devi in her own capacity

on one hand, and Shri Mahabir Singh, the brother of late Shri Rambir Singh, have agreed to settle all their disputes in the following terms: -

a) All the parties agree to abide by the Will dated 8th May, 2013 of Late Sh. Rambir Singh and agree not to challenge the same.

b) Shri Mahabir Singh shall continue to take care of the property as a custodian and shall continue to collect all the rents from the suit property till the

time Master Digvijay Singh attains the age of 21 years. Upon Master Digvijay Singh attaining the age of 21 years, the property shall be handed over to

him as per the wishes of his father.

c) The property consists of two and a half floors and consists of six rooms i.e. three rooms on the ground floor and three rooms on the first floor and

one tin shed on the roof of the property. Presently four rooms are on rent and the rental income generated from the four rooms is stated to be

Rs.23,500/- per month. Out of the said amount, Sh. Mahabir Singh shall deposit a sum of Rs.5,000/- per month in each of the bank accounts of Kumari

Nisha, and Master Digvijay Singh. The Bank account details of the said two children have been already given to Sh. Mahabir Singh.

d) Shri Mahabir Singh would be entitled to deduct a sum of Rs.2,000/- per month for the continued maintenance and upkeep

of the property. The balance amount of Rs.11,500/- shall be deposited on a half yearly basis with the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee

(hereinafter, “DHCLSC’) on a six monthly basis.

e) Shri Mahabir Singh is permitted to rent out the remaining rooms of the property. If a new tenant is inducted, the rental amount shall be divided

equally between Kumari Nisha and Master Digvijay and shall be deposited in their respective accounts. The remaining half amount shall be deposited

with the DHCLSC on a six monthly basis, on or before 10th July and 10th January, every year.

f) It is also agreed by Master Digvijay through his legal guardian

i.e. his mother, Smt. Suman Devi, that from the outstanding amount collected through rents by Sh. Mahabir Singh, for the period of June, 2013 to April,

2016, a lumpsum amount of Rs. 5,00,000/- will be deposited by Shri Mahabir Singh within a period of one year with the DHCLSC. No further amounts

would be payable by Shri Mahabir Singh in respect of the said period.

g) The amount of Rs. 5,00,000/- shall be released to Kum. Nisha at the time of her marriage. The release of the said amount shall be done by the

Secretary, DHCLSC after satisfying himself of the fixing of the marriage of Kumari Nisha and after giving notice to Shri Mahabir Singh. The said

amount would be liable to be released three months before the marriage along with proportionate interest, accrued thereon on the Rs.5,00,000/-

amount.

h) The Suit No.1765/2016 titled “Suman Devi & Ors. v. Mahabir Singh & Anr.†filed by the Plaintiffs against Shri Mahabir Singh in the

Karkardooma Court shall be withdrawn.

i) The Secretary, DHCLSC shall be permitted to inspect the suit property at least once every year till Master Digvijay attains majority in order to

ensure that the entire rental income is being deposited regularly by Shri Mahabir Singh with DHCLSC.

j) Upon Master Digvijay attaining 21 years of age, he would be entitled to appear before the Secretary, DHCLSC and seek release of the entire

amount lying deposited, along with interest, accrued thereon. The Secretary, DHCLSC shall, at that stage, make appropriate enquiry as may be

needed, and after issuing notice to Shri Mahabir Singh and Smt. Suman Devi, release the entire amount in favour of Master Digvijay. The amount

already stated to have been deposited in the name of the Registrar General, Delhi High Court of Rs.5,17,000/- shall be transferred to the account of

Secretary, DHCLSC. The entire amount will now be kept in the account of DHCLSC in a Fixed deposit on automatic renewal mode.

k) The Secretary, DHCLSC will also at the time of making enquiries on a yearly basis also make enquiries in respect of the annual progress report of

Master Digvijay from his school etc. Smt. Suman Devi shall present the progress report of Master Digvijay to the Secretary, DHCLSC on an annual

basis. The suit is decreed as settled in the above terms.

7.

The parties who are present in Court agree to the terms of settlement set out above and have appended their signatures below. They have been

duly identified by their respective counsels.

8.

The Secretary, DHCLSC, Mr. Dig Vinay Singh is present and has been apprised of the order passed today. The parties are directed to appear

before Secretary, DHCLSC on 25th May, 2018.

9.

The Appeal and all pending applications are disposed of.