Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2020) 11 CAT CK 0081

Suman vs Govt. Of NCT Delhi & Others

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 20 November 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Aradhana Johri, Member (A)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No. 1723 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 290 words

Aradhana Johri, Member (A)

1.

The applicant has stated that she is wife of late Shri Manjeet Singh who was working with the respondents-Delhi Fire Service as Fire Operator and

died in harness on 28.09.2016. He was declared a martyr and ex-gratia relief of Rs. 1 Crore was sanctioned of which Rs. 40 lacs was to go to the

parents, if parents of the martyr were alive and Rs. 60 lacs to the widow, which is the position in this case, since the parents are alive. There is a

restraint order of the Civil Court on release of terminal benefits. Despite that the respondents have released ex-gratia of Rs. 40 lacs to the parents of

the deceased but have cited the restraint order of the Civil Court to not release the remaining Rs.60 lacs to the applicant. She has sought directions for

release of said amount to her.

2.

Ms Esha Mazumdar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents stated that the matter is a civil dispute in which there is a restraint

from the Competent Civil Court. In the said circumstances, the balance Rs. 60 lacs cannot be released to the applicant. Accordingly, the

representations of the applicant were rejected vide order no.1(58)/DC(HQ)/Relief/Ex-Gratia/2020/3276-3277 dated 30.09.2020.

3.

After hearing learned counsels for both the parties, where there is full sympathy with the family members of a martyr who died in harness, but

legally there is a restraint order of the Civil Court against which the remedy does not lie within the ambit of this Tribunal.

4.

In light of this, this OA cannot be allowed and is disposed of accordingly. The applicant is at liberty to seek legal remedy in the appropriate legal

forum. No order as to costs.