High CourtsDIVISION BENCH(2017) 03 MAD CK 0230

Sulaiman @ Lalkhan Jawathkhan vs Govindan, & Ors.

Madras High Court · Decided on 15 March 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.Manikumar, M.Govindaraj
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
931 of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

53 paragraphs · 495 words
1.

Not satisfied with the quantum of compensation of Rs.33,03,453/- with

interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum, from the date claim till deposit and

costs, to the injured, aged about 38 years, an Irrigation and Plumbing

Supervisor, who suffered 70% disablement, due to the crush injury, resulting in

amputation of left leg, has filed the instant appeal for enhancement of

compensation, and restricted to Rs.20,00,000/-.

2.

Going through the award and material on record, we could deduce

that appellant/injured was hospitalised between 21.09.2011 and 11.10.2011 in

Pondicherry-PIMS Hospital. Income claimed was 350 Kuwait Dinars. Supporting

avocation and salary, the appellant/injured has marked Ex.P.17, copy of the

Passport, Ex.P18, Return Air Ticket to Kuwait, Ex.P19, Salary certificate for 320

Kuwait Dinar, Ex.P20, copy of Employment ID Card, Ex.P22, letter of the

employer removing from service and Ex.P23, Order sanctioning, terminal

benefits to the appellant/injured.

3.

On the basis of oral and documentary evidence, the tribunal fixed the

monthly income as Rs.20,000/-. Finding that there is a permanent

disablement, due to amputation of left leg, and correlating the same, with

employment, the tribunal has awarded compensation of Rs.33,03,453/-, with

interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum, from the date of claim till deposit.

4.

On the appeal filed for enhancement of compensation, we have

requested the learned counsel for both parties to consider the various heads

under which compensation could be enhanced, on the principle of just

compensation.

5.

Going through the same, learned counsel for the parties on consensus

agreed that compensation awarded by tribunal should be enhanced to

Rs.51,90,453/-, as hereunder:

Monthly Income is fixed at : Rs.25,000/-

Future prospects 50% : Rs.12,500/-

Total income : Rs.37,500/-

Loss of Income

[Rs.37,500/- x 12 x 15 x 70%] : Rs.47,25,000/-

Pain and suffering : Rs. 1,50,000/-

Attender charges : Rs. 30,000/-

Extra Nourishment : Rs. 30,000/-

Medical Bills : Rs. 2,05,453/-

Transport based on Exs.P16 & P27 : Rs. 50,000/-

Total : Rs.51,90,453/- Compensation awarded by the Tribunal : Rs.33,03,453/-

In the light of consensus, amount is enhanced by : Rs.18,87,000/-

6.

In the light of consensus arrived, appellant/injured is entitled to an

enhanced compensation of Rs.51,90,453/- as against Rs.33,03,453/-, awarded

by the tribunal, with interest, at the rate of 7.5% per annum, from the date

claim till deposit.

7.

In view of the above, we direct Future General India Insurance

Company, Trichy, the 2nd respondent herein, to deposit the enhanced amount

of Rs.51,90,453/-, with interest, at the rate of 7.5% per annum, from the date

of claim till deposit and costs, less the statutory deposit, to the credit of

MCOP No.343 of 2011 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Principal

Sub Court), Vridhachalam, within a period of four weeks from the date of

receipt of a copy of this order. On such deposit, the appellant/claimant is

permitted to withdraw the same, by making necessary applications before the

tribunal.

8.

The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is allowed as indicated above. No

costs.