High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 11 P&H CK 0127

Sukhwinder Singh @ Raja vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 27 November 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajbir Sehrawat, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. (M) 30976 of 2018 (O&M)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 351 words

Rajbir sehrawat, j.

Present petition has been filed for seeking bail pending trial in FIR No.31 dated 07.04.2016 for the offences punishable under Sections

15/18/21/22/61/85 of NDPS Act, registered at Police Station Subhanpur, District Kapurthala.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that even as per the case of prosecution, the alleged recovery from the petitioner is of 150 grams of

intoxicant powder. However, on analysis by the FSL, the quantity of the prohibited substance i.e. Alprazolam is found only 0.28%. Accordingly, it is

contended by the counsel for the petitioner that even as per the case of the police, the recovery from the petitioner is of non-commercial quantity of

the prohibited substance. Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court dated 21.08.2018 rendered in Rajvir @ Raju

Vs. State of Punjab in CRM-M-35080 of 2018, to support his contention. It is further contended that the petitioner is in custody since 09.04.2016. The

investigation of the case is complete and the petitioner is not required for any investigation purposes. The trial shall take a long time.

On the other hand, learned State counsel, being instructed by ASI Dalvinder Singh, submits that the recovery from the petitioner is of heavy quantity,

therefore, he should not be released on bail. Still further, it is contended by the counsel that there have been one more case under the NDPS Act.

However, learned State counsel has not disputed that as per the FSL report, the total quantity of prohibited substance found in the entire recovery is

0.28% only.

In response to above, counsel for the petitioner submits that the said another case against the petitioner under NDPS Act was already decided. In that

case, the petitioner was sentenced only with imprisonment for two months and that sentence has already been undergone by him.

In view of the above, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner is granted the concession of bail pending

trial. He be released on bail pending trial subject to his furnishing bail bonds/surety to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Duty Magistrate.