High CourtsSingle Bench(1986) 09 P&H CK 0021

Sukhdev Singh vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 12 September 1986 · Citation: (1988) CriLJ 265

HON’BLE JUDGES
M.M. Punchhi, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 223 words

M.M. Punchhi, J.—In this petition u/s 482 of Cr. P.C. effort is being made to quash an F.I.R. registered against an ex-Sarpanch under Sections 409 and 201, Penal Code, for alleged defalcations and criminal breach of trust committed sometime between 1964 to 1969 while in office as a Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Babarpur, District Ludhiana.

2.

The claim of the petitioner is that as a Sarpanch, he was not a public servant, as defined in Section 21 of the Penal Code. And if that view is correct, it is maintained that the offence would at best be under Sections 406/201, Penal Code, attracting the bar of limitation u/s 468 of Cr.P.C.

3.

The argument has no basis. The petitioner is a public servant on account of Section 3(1) of the Punjab Gram Panchayat Act defining as to who is a public servant. It says that a ''public servant'' means a public servant as defined in Section 21 of the Penal Code, 1860 and shall include a Panch and a Sarpanch. This knocks out the foundation of the argument and consequently the plea of limitation.

4.

For the above reasons, the F.I.R. cannot be quashed; so also the proceedings which are based thereon before the learned Magistrate who has framed charge against the petitioner under Sections 409/201, Penal Code. This petition is accordingly dismissed.