High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 12 DEL CK 0189

Sudesh Kumar vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation

Delhi High Court · Decided on 22 December 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Miscellaneous (Main) No. 500 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 314 words

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J

CM(M) 500/2020 & CM APPL.25787/2020 (stay)

1.

The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2.

Petitioner impugns order dated 05.10.2020 whereby the application of the petitioner for grant of interim stay pending his appeal under Section

343(2) of Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 against the order of demolition dated 21.09.2020 was dismissed.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that apart from the fact that his documents were not considered solely on the ground that some of the

documents i.e. lease deeds were unregistered, he submits that the order passed by the Assistant Engineer dated 21.09.2020 was in breach of

principles of natural justice, in as much as, the officer who granted a hearing to the petitioner on 20.02.2019 is not the officer who has passed the

order and the officer who has passed the order is not the one who even heard the petitioner at any point of time during the said proceedings.

4.

Since the officer who had heard the petitioner is not the one who had passed the order and the officer who has passed the order is not the one who

even heard the petitioner, prima facie, I am of the view that this order is not sustainable.

5.

In view of the above, the impugned order dated 05.10.2020 passed by the Appellate Tribunal declining to grant stay during the pendency of the

appeal is not sustainable and, accordingly, is set aside. There shall be stay of the operation of the demolition order dated 21.09.2020 till the disposal of

the Appeal.

6.

However, it would be open to the respondents to withdraw the order dated 21.09.2020 and pass a fresh speaking order after hearing the petitioner.

7.

Petition is allowed in the above terms.

8.

Copy of the judgment be uploaded on the website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email by the Court Master.