High CourtsSingle Bench(1922) 12 MAD CK 0066

Subrahmania Chetty and Another vs The British Indian Steam Navigation Company Ltd., by their Managing Agent, Mackinnon Mackenzie

Madras High Court · Decided on 22 December 1922 · Citation: AIR 1923 Mad 523 : 72 Ind. Cas. 408 : (1923) 17 LW 363

HON’BLE JUDGES
Krishnan, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 122 words

Krishnan, J.—In this case the burden was on the plaintiff to prove shortage as the bill of lading expressly says "that weight, contents and value when snipped unknown;" see In re Anglo-Russian Merchant Traders and John Batt & Co., London (1917) 2 K.B. 679 : 86 L.J.K.B. 1360 : 116 L.T. 805 : 61 S.J. 591. No attempt has been made by plaintiff to prove this though about a month''s time seems to have been given to him by the learned District Munsif. It is urged that I should give him a further opportunity of proving his case. I am unable to do so, as I think he had ample opportunity already. The civil revision petition fails and is dismissed with costs.