High CourtsDivision Bench(2024) 10 CAL CK 0025

Subodh Pramanik vs State Of West Bengal & Ors

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 3 October 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Joymalya Bagchi, J · Gaurang Kanth, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
MAT 1106 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 204 words

Joymalya Bagchi, J

1.

Appellant has assailed judgment and order dated 17.05.2023 whereby the Hon’ble Single Judge held whether installation of the new tube well would amount to encroachment on private land of the appellant requires to be decided in a civil suit.

2.

Factual matrix of the case shows when appellant had purchased the property from the erstwhile owner, a tube well was standing on the property. But it was not functioning. Appellant complains in place of the tube well, a solar pumping system has been set up by the Panchayat authorities by encroaching on his land.

3.

It is admitted a tube well was already in existence at the spot. Panchayat authorities have renovated the tube well into a solar pumping system. Whether such activity encroached on the private rights of the appellant is a disputed question of fact which requires to be adjudicated in a civil suit.

4.

We find no reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and order.

5.

Accordingly, appeal is dismissed.

6.

Consequently, connected application is also dismissed.

7.

There shall be no order as to costs.

8.

Photostat certified copy of this judgment, if applied for, be given to the parties on compliance of all formalities.