AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.
A counter affidavit is filed on behalf of the concerned
respondent.
Learned counsel for the State points out from Annexures-C
and D that the admissible dues under the Death-cum-Retiral Gratuity
has been authorized in favour of the wife of the petitioner who has
died. Similarly, pension amount of the deceased employee till he was
alive has also been authorized. No application has been filed for
substitution of the writ petitioner.
On going through the statement made in the diverse counter
affidavits and after hearing the Counsel for the State, it appears that
the State respondents have already taken steps towards redressal of
the grievance of the deceased writ petitioner inasmuch as the
admissible dues have been sanctioned/paid in favour of the widow.
The writ application is disposed of granting liberty to the
widow of the deceased employee to take appropriate steps towards
disbursement of the payment already sanctioned/authorized in her
favour. It will also be open to the widow to approach the concerned
authority if any other grievance relating to the payment to which the
deceased employee was entitled for ventilation of those grievances.
The writ application is disposed of.