High CourtsSingle Bench(1998) 07 J&K CK 0032

Subash Singh & Ors. vs J & K State Road Transport Corporation & Ors.

Jammu And Kashmir High Court · Decided on 20 July 1998 · Citation: (1999) KashLJ 126

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.C.Gandhi, J
CASE NUMBER
S. W. P. No, 203/95

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

35 paragraphs · 744 words
1.

Petitioners by means of this petition seek the issuance of a writ mandamus commanding the respondents to confirm them as drivers with effect

from 22101988 and to grant the benefit of arrears of salary in the payscale of Rs. 12002140.

2.

They further seek the determination of their seniority after treating them as drivers with effect from 22101988.

The petitioners while working as cleaners, have been promoted temporarily as drivers under order No. JKSRTC/ECI/ 3211 dated 22r101993,

issued by the Executive Director, SRTC, in the payscale of Rs. 8101750 plus COLA as admissible under the Corporation Rules, with the

stipulation that their regularisation in the payscale of drivers will be considered after they get their driving licenses converted into hill licenses. The

petitioners have not been promoted by the respondent as they are not possessed of the hill licences. It is also averred in the petition that the State

Transport Authorities have lifted their condition of possessing hill licence and the stipulation contained in the order dated 22 101993 for

consideration of the petitioners for promotion to the post of driver after they produce hill licence, is arbitrary and against law. Learned counsel has

also produced in the court Photostat copy of the certificates, issued by the Registering Licensing Authority created under the Motor Vehicles Act,

1988, to the effect that under the new Motor Vehicles Act and the Rules framed thereunder in 1992, there is no mention of driving licence to be

issued for hill or plain routes and the driving licences issued after the enforcement of the new Act and the Rules, are valid throughout the country

and that the licences issued before the enforcement of the new Act and the Rules, also fall in the same category.

3.

Respondents have filed objections stating therein that as per Rules, it is pre requisite condition for every driver to possess a valid driving licence

of hilly area and because of the fact that at the relevant time of temporary promotion of the petitioners since they were only having licences for plain

routes, therefore, they could not be considered for promotion. However, the regularisation/promotion of the petitioners is subject to the availability

of vacancies and the seniority, merit and fitness. It is further stated that it is nowherestated by the petitioner that from which date the condition of till

licence has been withdrawn, therefore, the are not entitled to be promoted.

4.

The petition is admitted to hearing and taken up for disposal at the joint request of learned counsel for the parties at this stage as pleadings are

complete.

5.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

6.

It is not denied by Mr. Nanda, learned counsel for the respondents that after the coming into force of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 arid the

Rules framed thereunder in 1992, there is no provision for issuance of the licences by the Registering and Licensing Authority for plain/hilly area.

The certificate issued by the said authority referred to above has also not been disputed by Mr. Nanda. The petitioners are no doubt entitled to

seek consideration for the post of driver as they have been working as such being placed in the pay scale of Rs. 8101750 under order dated

22101993 from which date petitioners are seeking their promotion and regularisation. Once it is established that under new Act and the Rules

framed, there is no provision for issuance of the hill licence, the respondents cannot place such a stipulation rendering the petitioners ineligible

seeking consideration for promotion. The condition imposed is found arbitrary and not based on any provision of law or the rules meant from the

purpose.

7.

However, the submission of Mr. Nanda that the petitioners shall be considered for promotion according to the merit..................and subject to

availability of posts has fore as promotion of the petitioners can only be against the........................

8.

The petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioners for promotion to the post of driver, without

insisting upon the production of hill driving licence, according to their seniority, merit and suitability, provided the vacancies are available as on the

date of promotion of the petitioners under order date 22101993, they if found fit and cleared by the DPC for promotion, shall be given benefit of

promotion in the payscale of driver from the date of said order, by the respondents. No order as to costs.