High CourtsSingle Bench(1899) 06 CAL CK 0030

Stevenson vs Stevenson

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 19 June 1899 · Citation: (1899) ILR (Cal) 764

HON’BLE JUDGES
Stanley, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 64 words

Stanley, J.—Counsel on behalf of the petitioner states that he does not desire to cross-examine the respondent. The respondent has filed an affidavit in which he states that he is without any means whatever. The application must consequently be dismissed. I reserve the question of costs. The petitioner to have liberty, if such liberty be required, to renew the application at any future time.