High CourtsDivision Bench(2011) 01 OHC CK 0031

State Transport Employess Faderation vs Orissa State Road Transport Corporation and Others

Orissa High Court · Decided on 17 January 2011 · Citation: (2011) 1 OLR 496

HON’BLE JUDGES
L. Mohapatra, J · A. Suresh, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 1290 of 2003

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 222 words
1.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

In both the writ applications the question for consideration was as to whether the General Manager (Administration), OSRTC can be authorized to exercise the powers of the appellate authority in respect of Bhubaneswar and Berhampur Division in addition to his own duties.

3.

Admittedly under the Rules, the Divisional Managers are the appellate authorities in respect of the respective Divisions. In absence of the Divisional Managers, the General Manager (Administration) had been authorized to act as the appellate authority. During pendency of the writ applications, on 4.8.2010 two officers have been promoted to the post of Divisional Managers, OSRTC, one at Berhampur and the other at Sambalpur.

4.

Since under the Rules, the Divisional Manager of the Division is the appellate authority, all appeals pending before the General Manager (Administration) for disposal be transmitted to the office of the two Divisional Managers for disposal in accordance with law. So far as Cuttack Division is concerned, if any Divisional Manager is available, he may decide the appeals or in the alternative one of the said two officers at Berhampur or Sambalpur be authorized to deal with the appeals of Cuttack Division.

5.

With the above direction, both the writ applications are disposed of.

6.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.