High CourtsDivision Bench(2022) 11 OHC CK 0035

State Transport Authority, Odisha & Another vs TATA Motors Finance Ltd

Orissa High Court · Decided on 3 November 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. Muralidhar, CJ · M.S. Raman, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Appeal No.483 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 184 words
1.

It is seen that the State Transport Department has complied with the order dated 17th August, 2017 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.7544 of 2017 and endorsed the termination of hypothecation in the certificate of registration in accordance with Section 51 of the Motor Vehicles Act and Rule 60 and 61 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989. The learned Single Judge was also of the view that “the Registering Authority cannot refuse endorsement of hypothecation and cancellation thereof in the certification of registration on the grounds not permissible in law”.

2.

The said judgment has not been stayed by this Court and has held the filed for more than five years now. In the circumstances, the Court sees no reason to interfere with the impugned order at this stage. Even on merits, the Court finds no reason to interfere as the requirement for making endorsement of hypothecation or cancellation thereof on the certification of registration is not connected to the renewal of trade certificate issued in favour of the finance company.

3.

The writ appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.

.....................................................