Supreme CourtDivision Bench(1996) 02 SC CK 0217

State of U.P. and Another vs Zia Khan

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 13 February 1996 · Citation: (1998) 8 SCC 483

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. C. Sen, J · M. M. Punchhi, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 396 of 1984

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 259 words
1.

This appeal by special leave is against the judgment and order of the Allahabad High Court dated 12-9-1979 passed in Second Appeal No. 1854 of 1979.

2.

The respondent, Zia Khan, was undeniably in possession of a small parcel of land admeasuring 11 bighas and 2 biswas described as "grove". He was sought to be evicted therefrom by employing the U.P. Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1972. When the orders went against him, he filed a civil suit for declaration of his title as becoming the Sirdar of the land in dispute. His plaint was rejected on the principles of Section 10 of the Act putting a bar for continuation of the suit. His first appeal failed. The High Court however came to his rescue in second appeal in upsetting the orders of the courts below and effecting a remand for the trial of the suit on merit. This has been questioned herein by the State.

3.

It cannot be disputed that the question of title cannot be decided under the U.P. Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1972 and the decision on the subject had either to be made by the revenue court or the civil court, as the case may be. Here, the High Court has asserted that principle in coming to the rescue of the respondent. Having gone through the judgment of the High Court carefully, we find no ground to differ from the view taken. The order of the High Court must therefore sustain. The appeal is consequentially dismissed. No costs.