High CourtsDivision Bench(2026) 08 MEG CK 1318

State Of Meghalaya, Represented By The Public Prosecutor vs Shri. Kial Bhoi, Son Of Shri. Siril Muiai, Resident Of Mukroh Pohtriang Village, Laskein Block, West Jaintia Hills District, Meghalaya - 793150

Meghalaya High Court · Decided on 19 August 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
B. Bhattacharjee, J · W. Diengdoh, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Crl.M.C. No. 162 of 2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 253 words
1.

Heard Mrs. N.G. Shylla, learned Sr. GA assisted by Ms. S. Kh. Nongrum, learned GA for the State applicant, who has submitted that the applicant has preferred an appeal before this Court against the impugned judgment and related order of sentence dated 17.06.2025 passed by the Court of the learned Sessions Judge, West Jaintia Hills District, Jowai in Sessions Case No. 1 of 2022, whereby, he was acquitted of the charge under Section 326 and 302 IPC.

2.

However, while preferring an appeal, a delay of 92 days has occurred, due to the fact that the certified copy of the said impugned judgment and related order of sentence passed by the Court of the learned Sessions Judge, West Jaintia Hills District, Jowai was received by the applicant belatedly. In view of the aforesaid reasons which were beyond the control of the applicant, he could not prefer an appeal within the prescribed period of limitation. It is therefore prayed that the delay be condoned and the appeal be admitted.

3.

Mr. S. Chanda, learned Legal Aid Counsel appearing for the respondent has no objection to the prayer for condonation of the delay.

4.

On consideration of the submission made, we are persuaded to allow this application on being satisfied that the grounds cited for the delay contain sufficient cause. Accordingly, the delay of 92 days in preferring the appeal is hereby condoned.

5.

Registry is directed to diarize the appeal and list it for admission after 1(one) week.

6.

Misc. Case disposed of.