Supreme CourtDivision Bench(1998) 12 SC CK 0025

State of Meghalaya and Another vs Prem Nath Prasad

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 4 December 1998 · Citation: (1999) 2 GLT 12

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sujata V. Manohar, J · B. N. Kirpal, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 608 of 1998 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No''s. 16263-64 of 1998)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 176 words
1.

Heard both sides. Leave granted.

2.

The High Court while deciding the appeal from an order dated 19.12.95 passed by the learned Additional Deputy Commissioner, East Khasi Hills District, Shillong, has directed that cost should be paid by the learned Additional Deputy Commissioner, East Khasi Hills District, Shillong. The original order of 19.12.1995 was passed by the Additional Deputy Commissioner, East Khasi Hills, District Shillong, in his judicial capacity while deciding an application for grant of probate. Even if the High Court has allowed the appeal, we fail to see how the High Court can direct a Judicial Officer who has passed the order in his judicial capacity to pay the costs.

3.

We, therefore, set aside that part of the order of the High Court which directs the learned Additional Deputy Commissioner to pay the costs of Rs. 2,000/- and which directs that the same shall be entered in one of the State Relief Funds.

4.

The appeals are accordingly allowed and the last five lines of the impugned order stand deleted as above.