High CourtsDivision Bench(2022) 02 KL CK 0021

State Of Kerala, Rep. By The Secretary vs Dr.Firos Ahammed.A., S/o M.Abdul Salim

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 2 February 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. Manikumar, CJ · Shaji P. Chaly, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Appeal No.163 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

45 paragraphs · 824 words

S.Manikumar, C.J.

1.

This writ appeal is filed by the appellants, who are the respondents in the writ petition, being aggrieved by the interim order dated 27.1.2022 in W.P.

(C)No.2622/2022 directing the respondents 2 and 3 in the writ petition namely, the Director of Medical Education and the Commissioner of Entrance

Examinations respectively, to include the name of the respondent/petitioner in the list to be published for PG Medical Courses under service quota

provisionally.

2.

Reliefs sought for in the writ petition are as follows:

i) to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 2nd respondent/the Director of Medical Education and 3rd respondent/the

Commissioner of Entrance Examinations to reserve a seat in Post Graduate Medical Course in General Surgery in service quota under DME.

ii) to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Kerala Administrative Tribunal to deliver the order in O.A.

(Ekm)No.743/2020 which is taken for orders at the earliest.

3.

Pending disposal of the writ petition, writ petitioner has sought for the following interim relief:

 “direct the 2nd respondent/the Director of Medical Education and 3rd respondent/the Commissioner of Entrance Examinations to reserve a seat in Post Graduate

Medical Course in General Surgery in service quota under DME, during the pendency of the writ petition.â€​

4.

Giving due consideration to the averments in the writ petition and the direction sought for in the interim relief, the writ court on 27th January 2022 in

W.P.(C)No.2622/2022 ordered thus:

“The petitioner submits that the authorities have recommended regularisation of the service of the petitioner as per Ext.P2. The Kerala Administrative Tribunal has

heard O.A.No.743 of 2020 filed by the petitioner seeking regularisation and the said O.A is posted to 01.02.2022 for passing final orders. Therefore, if the respondents

proceed to publish the select list without regard to the claim of the petitioner, the petitioner will be put to irreparable loss and untold hardship.

2.

Admit.

3.

The learned Government Pleader takes notice for respondents 1 to 4.

4.

In the circumstances of the case, there will be an interim order directing respondents 2 and 3 to include the name of the petitioner also in the list to be published for

admission to P.G Medical Course under Service Quota. The inclusion of the name of the petitioner will be strictly provisional and would be subject to further orders

from this Court.

Post this writ petition on 03.02.2022 for further orders.â€​

5.

According to Sri.P.G.Pramod, learned Government Pleader appearing for the appellants, Rules 4 and 5 stipulate that the candidates should be a

regular staff with minimum service as prescribed therein. But the respondent/writ petitioner does not have the eligibility as he is not a regular

employee in Medical Education Service as provided under the Act of 2008 and the Rule of 2009. He further contended that as per the direction of the

National Medical Commission, the admission to PG Medical Courses are to be completed on or before 3.2.2022. Therefore, inclusion of the petitioner

though provisionally in service quota may lead the admission process getting entangled with further litigations. Another contention raised by the

appellants is that the learned Single Judge has not appreciated clause 6-6-12 of the prospectus issued by the Government while passing the interim

order. Clause 6-6-12 of the prospectus issued by the Government deals with the eligibility for service quota prescribes that the applicants under

service quota should have necessarily completed their probation in the respective cadre, which means an applicant should be a full member of the

respective service.

6.

On this day, when the matter came up for hearing, Mr.N.N.Sugunapalan, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent/writ petitioner

submitted that O.A.No.743 of 2020 filed by the petitioner seeking regularisation was allowed on 1.2.2022, directing regularisation of the

respondent/writ petitioner in Government service from 2016 onwards. Submission of the learned Senior Counsel is placed on record.

7.

As on the date of filing of the writ petition, the only impediment in considering the case of the writ petitioner to avail the eligibility for service quota

was that he did not satisfy the conditions stipulated in the Kerala Medical Officers Admission to Post Graduate Courses under Service Quota Act,

2008 and the the Kerala Medical Officers Admission to Post Graduate Courses under Service Quota Rules, 2009 and the Prospectus. Now that the

Kerala Administrative Tribunal has directed absorption and regularisation of the respondent/writ petitioner from 2016 onwards, it is for the appellants 1

to 3 to consider inclusion of the case of the respondent/writ petitioner, keeping in mind the prospectus issued for admission to Medical Post Graduate

Degree Courses 2021-2022, the statutory provisions and the G.O. (MS)No.18/2022/H&FWD dated 15.1.2022.

8.

Sri.P.G.Pramod, learned Government Pleader appearing for the appellants shall communicate copy of the judgment to the appellants forthwith.

Writ appeal is accordingly disposed of.

(Registry is directed to issue a copy of this judgment today itself.)