AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Heard Mr. Ajay Bihari Sinha, learned senior counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Anurag Saurav, learned counsel for opposite party no.4.
The instant application has been filed on behalf of the petitioners for modification of the order dated 25.02.2019 passed in LPA No.834 of 2018 whereby the Division Bench had found no infirmity in the order of the learned Single Judge to cause any interference therewith save and except that the District Magistrate, Vaishali-cum-Chairman District Health Society, Vaishali was directed to examine the claim set up by the writ petitioners, satisfy himself on its veracity and thereafter make payment of the admissible amount within a total period of eight weeks. It was further directed that if the respondent District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Vaishali fail to make payment of the admissible amount by 27th April, 2019 each of the respondent-writ petitioners would be entitled to interest on their pending claims @ 7% per annum payable from the date the respective bill became due until the date of payment.
The petitioners have filed the present application with a prayer to extend the period stipulated in order dated 25.02.2019 passed in LPA No.833 of 2018 and other analogous cases.
Mr. Sinha, learned senior counsel for the petitioners submitted that in physical verification and examination of the accounts of the claimant-writ petitioners a lot of difficulties arose as of result of which the order could not be complied within the stipulated period. He submitted that under such circumstance, it is desirable that the period for making payment of the admissible amount of the writ petitioners be extended for a further period of two months.
The contention advanced on behalf of the petitioners has been objected by opposite party no.4. A submission has been made that it is a belated effort on the part of the petitioners to deny the payment of interest awarded in favour of the writ petitioners. He submitted that the prayer of the petitioners is simply an effort to get alteration in the order passed by the Court which has already attained finality.
Having considered the rival submissions and perused the materials on record, we see no justifiable reason to modify the order dated 25.02.2019 passed in LPA No.833 of 2018. The application is dismissed, accordingly.
