Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2012) 03 SC CK 0074

State of Andhra Pradesh vs Younus Bin Omer Yafai alias Younus Bhai and Another

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 16 March 2012 · Citation: (2013) 3 RCR(Criminal) 234

HON’BLE JUDGES
J.S. Khehar, J · B.S. Chauhan, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 536 of 2012 (Arising out of SLP (Cri) No. 6668 of 2011)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 221 words
1.

Leave granted. We have heard Mr. Harin Rawal, learned Additional Solicitor General and Mr. Altaf Ahmad, learned senior Counsel for the Respondents. We have gone through the impugned judgment and order dated 21.7.2011, and perused the record of the case. Learned Counsel for the Appellant has contended that without assigning any reason the High Court has passed the order granting bail to the Respondents.

2.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we are not satisfied with the manner in which the bail application has been disposed of by the High Court as no reason whatsoever, has been assigned for grant of bail. In view of the above, impugned order dated 21.7.2011 is set aside and we request the High Court to decide the bail application afresh within a period of six weeks from today. The Respondents shall remain protected in the meantime. However, we make it clear that we have not expressed any view one way or the other on the merits of the case.

3.

In case the application is not disposed of within the stipulated time, the Respondents shall be at liberty to renew their prayer for interim bail before the High Court. Needless to say that the parties will co-operate and will not take unwarranted adjournments before the High Court. The appeal is disposed of.