Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2023) 07 NCLT CK 3532

State Bank Of India vs Karan U Jethwani & Ors.

National Company Law Tribunal · Decided on 13 July 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. Venkata Ramakrishna Badarinath Nandula, Member (Judicial) · Sh. Charan Singh, Member (Technical)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
IA (IBC) 959/2023 in CP(IB) No.448/95/HDB/2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 194 words

O R D E R

Learned RP Shri Dommeti Surya Rama Krishna Saibaba, for the Applicant is present.

This is an application filed by the RP stating that he has not received any repayment plan from the guarantor.

We have perused the report of the RP. According to the RP despite providing opportunity to the personal guarantor, personal guarantor has not submitted any repayment plan. Record discloses that before filing the present application financial creditor has served notice to the personal guarantor. Therefore under these circumstances we admitted this Application under Section 100 of 1&B code, 2016 and ordered Moratorium in terms of Section 101 of the Code.

The record reveals that opportunity has been given to the personal guarantor to submit the plan, however, no plan has been submitted. Therefore, as rightly contended, resolution of insolvency of the personal guarantor, in the absence of a repayment plan being not possible, this application is allowed and proceedings are closed, giving liberty to the financial creditor to move an application if they so choose, under Section 121 of IBC.

Accordingly, IA (IBC) No.959/2023, is allowed and disposed of.

In the result Company petition stands closed.