High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 06 MAD CK 0185

S.S.N.Vijayan And Others vs State

Madras High Court · Decided on 26 June 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
G.K.Ilanthiraiyan, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Original Petition (MD) No. 11122, 11158 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 556 words

G.K.Ilanthiraiyan, J

1.

The petitioners/A1 and A57 to A60, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 408, 420, 468, 477, 471 and 34 IPC in Crime No.2 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners along with the other accused, by attaching deficit property, has obtained cash credit loan from the Alangulam Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society with an intention to misappropriate the public money. Hence, the case.

3.Heard. Perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report.

4.It is seen that there are 60 accused involved in this case and the petitioners are arrayed as A1 and A57 to A60. Insofar as the first accused is concerned, he was a member of the society and he obtained loan by pledging the original document. However, without repaying the loan amount, the petitioner had taken the original title deed. 81 enquiry was conducted and thereafter, surcharge proceedings was also issued as against the petitioners under Sections 87 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983. It was challenged before this Court in W.P(MD)No.24437 of 2022 and this Court has granted an interim order, dated 27.10.2022 and directed the petitioner to deposit Rs.25,00,000/-. The said order was complied with. Insofar as the accused Nos.57 to 60 are concerned, the misappropriation amount of Rs.15,31,380/- has also been recovered and it was also confirmed by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor. Considering the above, the custodial interrogation of the petitioners are not necessary in this case, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions:

5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate NO.II, Tirunelveli, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent Police, daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;

[c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.