AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners in
the above said two cases in Crl.P.No.10018/2017 and
Crl.P.No.10019/2017. The petitioners have sought for
quashing of the entire investigation in Crime
Nos.63/2017 and 482/2017 respectively on the file of
Ramamurthynagar Police Station. Crime No.63/2017
was registered for the offences under Sections 353, 504,
506 read with Section 34 of IPC, whereas the Crime
No.482/2017 is registered for the offence under Section
448 read with Section 34 of IPC.
The learned Counsel for the petitioners
submits that there are lot of materials available with the
petitioners to show that the case has been falsely lodged
by the complainant-first respondent in the above said
two cases.
As could be seen from the First Information
Report in both the cases, there are certain allegations
made against the petitioners. The truth or falsity of
those allegations have to be tested during the course of
investigation after examining the accused also by the
police. The petitioners are at liberty to furnish all the
materials available with them to the Investigating Officer
and in turn, the Investigating Officer has to receive all
the materials that may be produced by the accused-
petitioners herein and investigate the matter impartially
and submit appropriate report to the Court. If any
adverse report or chargesheet is filed against the
petitioners by the Police without any basis, they are at
liberty to approach this Court once again, if need arises.
With these observations, the petitions are
disposed of. In view of the disposal of the main petitions,
I.A.No.1/2017 filed in both the cases stand disposed of
accordingly.