High Courts(1914) 02 MAD CK 0021

Srinivasachariar vs Gopalan minor by his Father and Guardian Ramasami Aiyangar and Another

Madras High Court · Decided on 13 February 1914 · Citation: AIR 1914 Mad 637(2) : (1914) 26 MLJ 365

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 171 words
1.

The judge has dismissed the petition on the ground that the debts in respect of which the certificate is prayed for did not form the property of the

deceased but very probably they belong to one of the persons who oppose the grant of the succession certificate to the appellant. We are of

opinion that the question whether the debts belonged to the deceased is not a matter to be decided on this application. We agree with the decision

in Baikashi v. Parbhu Keval ILR (1903) B. 119 which has been followed in A.A.O. No. 42 of 1906 by Benson and Wallis JJ. We are unable to

agree with the opinion of the Chief Justice to the contrary in Radha Rani Dassi v. Brindabun Chundra Rasack ILR (1897) C. 320. The order of the

Lower Court is therefore reversed and the District Judge is directed to restore the application to his file and dispose of it according to law. Costs

hitherto incurred will be provided for in the final order.