High CourtsDivision Bench(1920) 02 CAL CK 0040

Srimati Dassya and Another vs Nibaran Chandra Ghosh

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 26 February 1920 · Citation: 56 Ind. Cas. 240

HON’BLE JUDGES
Lancelot Sanderson, C.J · Walmsley, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 105 words
1.

In this case we make this Kale absolute. The Rule was granted on the second ground that the report of the Jurors was defective as only four out of the five Jurors were present at the time of the investigation and so the report was illegal and it ought not to have been relied on. It appears that the Magistrate acted upon the report. In our judgment he should not have done so. He should have appointed a fresh Jury and allowed the proceedings to go on with the fresh Jury.

2.

The Rule is made absolute. The Magistrate must appoint a fresh Jury.