High CourtsSingle Bench(2013) 07 KAR CK 0276

Sri Ramachandra vs State of Karnataka

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 29 July 2013

HON’BLE JUDGES
H.N. Nagamohan Das, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision Petition No. 254 of 2013

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 189 words

H.N. Nagamohan Das, J.—Petitioner is the accused No. 2 in Crime No. 321/2009 for the offences punishable u/s 418, 419, 468 and 471

of IPC. Investigation is completed and charge sheet is filed in C.C. No. 539/2011. During the pendency of the proceedings before the trial court,

the petitioner filed an application u/s 239 of Cr.P.C. for discharge. The trial Court dismissed the application. Hence, this Criminal Revision Petition.

2.

From the investigating material it is seen that the petitioner purchased the site in question under a registered sale deed dated 08.10.1999.

According to the prosecution the signature of T.D. Yogish was forged and sale deed dated 08.10.1999 was executed in favour of the petitioner.

Now the investigating agency has collected some evidence and has filed the charge sheet. The same is required to be considered by the trial court,

by providing an opportunity to both the parties. This Court cannot asses and appreciate the evidence collected by the investigating agency at this

stage. 1 find no justifiable ground to interfere with the impugned order.

Accordingly, petition is hereby dismissed.

Trial Court is hereby directed to expedite the matter.