Supreme CourtFull Bench(2000) 03 SC CK 0097

Sri Prasada Rao Mikkilineni and Others vs State of A.P. and Others

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 16 March 2000 · Citation: (2000) 7 JT 409 : (2000) 9 SCC 371

HON’BLE JUDGES
Y. K. Sabharwal, J · Shivaraj V. Patil, J · S. B. Majmudar, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 2150 of 2000 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 21026 of 1997)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 208 words

S.B. Majmudar, J.—Leave granted.

2.

We have heard learned Counsel for the parties finally in this appeal.

3.

A limited notice was issued at the S.L. P. stage on 10th November, 1997 to the following effect:

Delay condoned, Issue notice for final disposal requiring the Respondents to show cause why reference as asked for should not be made.

4.

We find that there is a dispute about the title as also regarding computation of appropriate compensation for acquiring the land in question. Hence, this is a fit case where the High Court should have allowed the Writ Petition and should have directed the Land Acquisition Officer to make reference u/s 18 read with Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act. Only on this short ground, therefore, this appeal is allowed. The impugned order passed by the High Court is set aside and the Land Acquisition Officer is directed to make a reference, u/s 18 read with Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, to the appropriate Court within eight weeks from the receipt of a copy of this order at his end.

5.

Office to send a copy of this order to the Spl. Dy. Collector, Land Acquisition Officer (Central), Hyderabad (A.P) for necessary action.

6.

No costs.