High CourtsSingle Bench(2013) 01 KAR CK 0138

Sri Panchalingeshwara Recreation Club vs The Superintendent of Police, The Deputy Superintendent of Police and Sub Inspector of Police Keragodu Police Station

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 22 January 2013

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mohan Shantanagoudar, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 204 of 2013 (GM-Police)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 266 words

Mohan Shantanagoudar, J.—Learned High Court Government Pleader Sri. E.S. Indiresh, is directed to take notice for respondents. The petitioner is an Association registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960. The case of the petitioner-Association is that it is engaged in conducting sports and other cultural activities such as rummy, best of seven dart games, chess, carom, dance class and billiards for the benefit of its members. It is the case of the petitioner that the respondents are insisting that the petitioner should obtain license either under the Karnataka Police Act or under the provisions of Licensing and Controlling of Places of Public Amusement Order, 2002.

2.

Identical questions have been considered by this Court in WP. No. 18625/2005, disposed of on 27.1.2006 holding that permission under the Police Act is not required to run a Society or a Recreation Club of the present nature and the petitioner need not obtain any license to run the recreation activities for the benefit of its members. Accordingly, the following order is made:-

The respondents shall not insist that the petitioner should obtain the necessary license for the skilled games/indoor games such as rummy and best of seven and other lawful activities. But, however, that shall exclude the dart game, video game and electronic coin games.

This order however will not come in the way of the respondents monitoring the activities of the petitioner-Association. It is made clear that the respondents shall take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law, if it is found indulging in any unlawful, immoral or forbidden activities.

Petition is disposed of accordingly.