High CourtsDIVISION BENCH(2017) 04 KAR CK 0070

SRI. MALLAIAH S/O LATE HANUMAIAH vs STATE OF KARNATAKA

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 17 April 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, P.S.DINESH KUMAR
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
13424 TO 13425 of 2017 (GM - MMS)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 228 words
1.

Mr.V.G.Bhanuprakash, learned additional government

advocate, accepts notice for the respondents. Therefore,

formal service of notice to them is dispensed with.

2.

The Karnataka Land Revenue Act has been amended

by insertion of sub-Section (9) to Section 95 of the Karnataka

Land Revenue Act, 1964, with effect from January 8, 2015. It

contemplates that, where an application for conversion is made

for the purpose of quarrying minor minerals, whether specified

or non-specified, the owner must apply along with the fine

applicable to the Deputy Commissioner, for conversion of such

land. On such application, the permission for diversion of such

land shall be deemed to have been granted subject to obtaining

lease or licence or working permission.

3.

In these cases, the request was made on March 15,

2017. Shrimati Lubna Fairoze, learned advocate appearing for

the writ petitioners submits that fine has been deposited and

the writ petitioners have the necessary permission.

4.

Hence, under the provisions of the sub-Section (9) of

Section 95 of the said Act, the permission is deemed to have

been granted in favour of the writ petitioners, subject to

obtaining lease or licence or working permission of patta land.

5.

Therefore, the writ petitions are allowed by recording

that the permission for conversion is deemed to have been

granted in favour of the writ petitioners.

6.

We make no order as to costs.