High CourtsFull Bench(2003) 09 AHC CK 0277

Sri Krishna Murari Lal Varma vs Commissioner of Income Tax

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 2 September 2003 · Citation: (2005) 144 TAXMAN 461

HON’BLE JUDGES
Unieshwar Pandey, J · M. Katju, J
CASE NUMBER
IT Revision No. 147 of 1983 2 September 2003

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 171 words

This is a Reference u/s 226(1) of the Income Tax Act, in which two questions have been referred to us for our opinion, relating to penalty imposed:

"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal has rightly invoked the provisions of the Explanation to section 271(1)(c) which was deleted with effect from 1-4-1976 ?

2.

Whether there was any material for the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to hold that the assessee had not discharged the burden within the meaning of Explanation to section 271(1)(c) as it stood prior to 1-4-1976 and the Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee was liable to penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act ?"

2.

The Tribunal has found that the assessee has not discharged his burden under the Explanation to section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. This is a finding of fact and we cannot interfere with the same. Hence, we decide the Reference in the affirmative, i.e., in favour of the department and against the assessee.