High CourtsSingle Bench(2001) 09 MAD CK 0007

Sri Balaji Cylinders Private Limited and Others vs Commercial Tax Officer

Madras High Court · Decided on 10 September 2001 · Citation: (2001) 124 STC 671

HON’BLE JUDGES
D. Murugesan, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No''s. 16069 to 16071 of 2001 and W.M.P. No''s. 23883 to 23888 of 2001

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 504 words

D. Murugesan, J.—In all these writ petitions the petitioners have challenged B-6 notices issued by the respondent for realisation of arrears of

sales tax u/s 26 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as ""the Act""). The grievance of the petitioners is that as

per Section 26 of the Act, the petitioners are entitled to a copy of such notice, so as to work out their remedies by way of filing revision

applications before the revisional authority u/s 33. No such impugned notices were served on the petitioners. On the other hand, the notices were

straightaway served on the Indian Oil Corporation, Hindustan Petroleum and Bharat Petroleum Corporation. Hence, the petitioners were

constrained to challenge the very B-6 notices issued under the provisions of the Act.

2.

On September 5, 2001, I directed the learned Government Advocate to get instructions on the writ petitions. On instruction, the learned

Government Advocate submitted that the petitioners have got effective remedy of revision before the revisional authority and without availing of the

same the petitioners have approached this Court. The learned Government Advocate further submitted that the impugned proceedings cannot be

furnished to the petitioners, as once it is furnished, they will withdraw the amounts lying in the respective oil corporations. Hence, the learned

Government Advocate submitted that the writ petitions are liable to be dismissed.

3.

Heard. u/s 26 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 petitioners are entitled to have the copies of B-6 notices. Admittedly, the

petitioners have not been served with the B-6 notices. The respondent has served the notices directly on the respective oil corporations. Therefore,

the grievance of the petitioners that the petitioners have been effectively prevented from availing of the remedy of filing revision petitions, because

of the non-supply of the copies of B-6 notices, is reasonable and acceptable. The contention of the learned Government Advocate that the

impugned B-6 notices B-6 notices need not be served on the petitioners cannot be accepted. In view of the same, without going into the merits of

the case, the respondent is directed to serve the B-6 notices issued u/s 26 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act. 1959, to all the petitioners,

within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, so as to enable them to prefer revision petitions. The petitioners are at

liberty to file revision petitions before the revisional authority u/s 33 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, within the period of limitation

namely, 30 days from the date of service of the impugned notice on each of the petitioners, and the petitioners are also free to apply for stay of the

B-6 notices before the revisional authority. Till such time, the impugned notices shall not be given effect to, if not already been given effect to, as on

today. With the above directions, all the writ petitions are disposed of. No costs. Consequently, all the connected W.M.Ps. are closed.