High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 01 MAD CK 0309

Sri Ambal Mills Limited & Ors vs M/s.Shiva Texyarn Limited & Anr

Madras High Court · Decided on 10 January 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
M.Duraiswamy
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
3523 & 3524 of 2017 & C M P Nos 22586 & 22587 of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

36 paragraphs · 763 words
1.

Challenging the fair and final orders passed in I.A.Nos.163 and 164 of 2016 in A.O.P.Nos.302 and 303 of 2011 on the file of Principal District

Court, Coimbatore, the petitioners in AOPs have filed the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeals.

2.

Challenging the award passed in Award Nos. 3 and 4 of 2004 passed by the Arbitrator, the appellants have filed A.O.P.Nos.302 and 303 of

2011. On 19.01.2016, since the appellants failed to appear before the District Court, the District Court dismissed the petitions in A.O.P.Nos.302

and 303 of 2011 for default. On 08.02.2016, the appellants have filed the applications in I.A.Nos. 163 and 164 of 2016 to restore the petitions in

A.O.P.Nos.302 and 303 of 2011, which was dismissed for default on 19.01.2016. In the affidavit filed in support of the petitions, the 2nd

appellant has stated that he was laid up with viral fever, therefore, he could not meet their counsel and give instructions for arguing the matter

before the District Court.

3.

The respondents filed their counter and disputed the averments stated in the affidavit field in support of the petitions.

4.

The Court below, taking into consideration the case of both the parties, dismissed the applications finding that the appellants have filed the

applications only to drag on the proceedings and that the appellants have not given sufficient reasons for restoring the AOPs. While dismissing the

applications, the court below also taken into consideration the dismissal of the AOPs for default in the year 2013 and 2015. On the earlier

occasions, the applications were restored to file at the instance of the appellants and this is the 3rd occasion the AOPs were dismissed for default.

5.

Mr.S.Udayakumar, learned counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that final opportunity may be given to the appellants to make their

submissions before the District Court and a date may also be fixed for making submissions before the Court below.

6.

Mr.N.Manoharan, learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent submitted that cause of action arose as early as in the year 1997 and the

arbitral proceedings were initiated in the year 2004 and even after a lapse of several years, the appellants have not paid a single pie to the 1st

respondent-claimant. Further, the learned counsel submitted that the averments stated in the affidavit filed in support of the applications were rightly

rejected by the court below for the reason that the appellants have not given sufficient reason for restoring the applications.

7.

Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, though this is the 3rd occasion, in which the appellants have filed

applications for restoring the petitions, which were dismissed for default, since the appellants have stated that the 2nd appellant was laid up with

viral fever on 19.01.2016 and that they have filed the applications on 08.02.2016 itself, in the interest of justice, the appellants can be given a final

opportunity to make their submissions before the District Court, Coimbatore.

8.

Since the AOPs were pending from the year 2011, I am of the view that the AOPs can be restored to file on imposing the following terms:-

(i) The order passed in I.A.Nos. 163 and 164 of 2016 are set aside on condition that the appellants pay a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five

thousand only) in each of the AOP to the 1st respondent-claimant within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment;

(ii) The appellants are directed to pay the cost amount awarded by the Arbitrator to the 1st respondent-claimant, within one week from the date of

receipt of a copy of this judgment;

On compliance, the orders passed in I.A.Nos. 163 and 164 of 2016 shall be set aside and consequently, the applications in I.A.Nos. 163 and 164

of 2016 shall stand allowed.

9.

The appellants are directed to make their submissions before the District Court, Coimbatore, after complying the conditions as stated above.

The appellants are directed to make their submissions in A.O.P.Nos. 302 and 303 of 2011 on 23.01.2018 without seeking for any adjournment.

The respondents are at liberty to make their submissions in the AOPs before the District Court, Coimbatore after the completion of the

submissions by the appellants. The Principal District Judge, Coimbatore is directed to dispose of the petitions in A.O.P.Nos. 302 and 303 of

2011, within a period of four weeks, from the date of completion of the submissions by the learned counsel on either side.

With these observations, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.