High CourtsSingle Bench(2012) 08 KL CK 0251

Sreelakshmi Energy Systems (P) Ltd. vs Commercial Tax Inspector and State of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 22 August 2012

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.R. Ramachandra Menon, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) . 19856 of 2012 (F)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

26 paragraphs · 425 words

P.R. Ramachandra Menon, J.

APPENDIX

PETITIONERS EXHIBITS

P1

Copy of The Registration Certificate Dated 11-5-2007 Issued By The 2nd Respondent

P2

Copy of The Latest Return for The Quarter April to June 2012 Filed Before the Assessing Authority

P3

Copy of The Invoices Nos. 5146/2012-13 Dated 23-7-2012 Issued By M/S. Famous Piped Gas Equipments

P4

Copy of The Invoice No. 4787 Dated 27/7/2012 of M/S. H.R.Traders, Mumbai

P5

Copy of The Sale Invoice Nos. 077/12-13 of M/S. Bhimra Products, Mumbai

P6

Copy of The Notice Nos.353/12-13 Dated 29-7-2012 Issued By The 1st Respondent

P7

Copy of The Notice Nos. 355/12-13 Dated 27-7-2012 Issued By 1st Respondent

P8

Copy of The Notice Nos.352/12-13 Dated 29/7/2012 Issued By 1st Respondent

P9

Copy of The Reply Dated 7-8-2012 With Acknowledgment.

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS

NIL

1.

The petitioner is a registered dealer, both under the KVAT Act and CST Act as borne by Ext.P1 ''Certificate of Registration''. According to the petitioner, the petitioner is engaged in works contract, mainly dealing with LPG equipments and accessories. In the course of business operations as above, the petitioner purchased the requisite materials as per Exts.P3, P4 and P5 invoices from the consignor in Mumbai and they were being transported in the vehicles bearing No. KA 22 A 4906 & MH 11 AC 1546, when it was intercepted by issuing Exts.P6, P7 and P8 notices doubting evasion of tax and demanding security deposit which is forming the subject matter of challenge in this writ petition. The Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that, though the petitioner sought to substantiate the position by filing Ext.P9 reply, it did not turn to be fruitful and hence seeks for indulgence of this Court to solve the situation.

2.

Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. After hearing both the sides, this Court finds that there is considerable force in the submissions made from the part of the petitioner, in so far as Ext.P1 ''Certificate of Registration'' refers to various LPG/LNG/CNG insulating equipments and systems (works contract). However, whether there was any attempt to evade the tax, can be brought to light only in the course of adjudication proceedings. But, for that reason, the goods need not be detained any further and the same shall be released to the petitioner forthwith, on executing a ''simple bond'' without sureties. This shall be without prejudice to the rights and liberties of the competent authority to pursue the adjudication proceedings, which shall be completed in accordance with the relevant provisions of law, as expeditiously as possible.

Writ petition is disposed of.