High CourtsDivision Bench(2020) 03 DEL CK 0254

Sowmya T Gupta vs Department Of Delhi Transport Corporation (Through Its Chairperson) & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 13 March 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dhirubhai Naranbhai Patel, CJ · C. Hari Shankar, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 2674 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 374 words

D.N. Patel, CJ

1.

This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been preferred with the following prayers:

“a. For a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction to the Respondent No. 1 to reserve seats for transgender persons in the

DTC, cluster, feeder and mini buses plied by Respondent No. 1;

b. For a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction to Respondent No. 1 to provide free-of-cost travel to transgender

passengers in the DTC, cluster, feeder and mini buses plied by Respondent No. 1;

c. For a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction to the Respondent No. 2 to reserve seats for transgender persons in the

Delhi Metro trains plied by Respondent No. 2;

d. For any such other and suitable order/orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case

and in the interest of justice.â€​

2.

Having heard counsel of both the sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the petitioner has placed reliance

upon the decisions reported in National Legal Services Authority vs. Union of India and Others 2014 (5) SCC 438 and in Rajive Raturi vs. Union of

India and Others 2018 (2) SCC 413, for reservation of seats and providing free of cost travel to transgenders in Delhi Transport Corporation buses,

cluster buses, feeder buses and mini buses, plied by respondent no. 1 as well as for reservation of seats for transgender in Delhi Metro Rail

Corporation/respondent no. 2.

3.

We, therefore, direct the respondent nos. 1 and 2 to treat this writ petition as a representation and decide the same in accordance with law, rules,

regulations and Government policies as applicable to the facts of the case and also keeping in the mind the aforesaid decisions, upon which reliance

has been placed by the counsel for the petitioner. Representations have already been preferred by the petitioner, which are annexed as Annexures P-

1 and P-2 to the memo of this writ petition. The decision will be taken by the respondent nos. 1 and 2 as expeditiously as possible and practicable.

4.

In view of these observations, this writ petition is hereby disposed of.