High CourtsDivision Bench(2026) 10 CHH CK 2002

Sourabh Nishad vs State Of Chhattisgarh & Ors.

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur · Decided on 13 October 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Krushna Ram Mohapatra, C.J · Santosh Sharma, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
WA No. 990 of 2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 194 words

Per Krushna Ram Mohapatra, Chief Justice

1.

Heard Mr. Tanuj Patwardhan, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Ms. Anuja Sharma, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondents No. 1 & 2, and Dr. Saurabh Kumar Pande, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No. 3.

2.

Order dated 31.08.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in WPS No. 6373 of 2026 is under challenge in this writ appeal.

3.

Learned Single Judge, while dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant, held that the petitioner did not possess the requisite qualification to apply for the post of Teacher in B.Sc. (Agriculture). In view of the observations made in WPS No. 6260 of 2026 (Vishnu Ditya & Others vs. State of Chhattisgarh), referred to by the learned Single Judge, and the observations made by the co-ordinate Bench in WPS No. 3309 of 2024, disposed of vide order dated 05.02.2025, learned counsel for the appellant prays for withdrawal of the writ appeal.

4.

Ms. Sharma, learned Deputy Government Advocate, and Dr. Pande, learned counsel, have no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the appellant.

5.

Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.