High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 05 KL CK 0105

Soumya V.S vs Haridas And Ors

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 11 May 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.V. Kunhikrishnan, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision Petition No. 334 Of 2007

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 210 words
1.

This revision petition is filed against the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellant as per the judgment dated 26.11.2020 in Crl.A.No.274 of

2017 on the file of the Session's Judge, Thrissur which arises from the judgment dated 06.11.2017 in S.T.No.117 of 2017 on the file of the Judicial

Magistrate of the First Class - II, Chalakudy. It was a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

2.

When this revision came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner submitted that the matter is settled and a

compounding petition is filed. A counsel appeared for the first respondent and he submitted that an affidavit is filed stating that the matter is settled

and the first respondent has no grievance against the petitioner. Heard the learned Public Prosecutor also.

3.

In the light of the fact that the matter is settled between the parties and a compounding petition is also filed, I think the conviction and sentence

imposed on the revision petitioner can be set aside.

Therefore, this Crl.R.P. is allowed. The conviction and sentence imposed on the appellant, as per the judgment dated 26.11.2017 in Crl.A.No.274 of

2017 which arises from the judgment dated 06.11.2017 in S.T.No. 117 of 2017, is set aside.