High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 09 SHI CK 0017

Sonika vs State Of Himachal Pradesh

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 8 September 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anoop Chitkara, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (Main) No. 395 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 318 words

Anoop Chitkara, J

This petition coming on for admission this day, the Court passed the following:

FIR No.

Dated

Police Station

Sections

68/2021

26.6.2021

East Shimla

317, IPC

1.

Seeking quashing of FIR captioned above, the accused has come up before this Court under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

2.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the Court files and the pleadings.

ANALYSIS AND FINDING

3.

The allegations against the accused are that in the morning of 26th June, 2021, the police official, who was deputed in the security of Hon'ble the Chief Minister and was residing in the Chief Minister House Complex had gone for morning walk. At around 7.00 a.m. from the road below the Chief Minister residence, he heard cries of a small kid. On reaching there, he noticed that a newly born child was kept in the grass. Even the umbilical cord was attached to the child. On this, he guarded the child, informed the police officials and eventually the child was sent to Kamla Nehru Hospital. Further investigation found that the petitioner was biological mother of the child. Based on such information, the police registered the FIR captioned above.

4.

The inherent powers of the High Court under Section 482, Cr.PC to quash an FIR are invoked only when prima facie no case is made out on the evidence collected by the prosecution. In the present case, there is evidence which cannot be considered at the stage of Section 482. Cr.PC.

5.

This Court neither finds prima facie case for quashing nor is inclined to look into the merits of the allegations.

6.

In the facts and circumstances peculiar to this case, the petition for seeking quashing of FIR is dismissed. The observations made by this Court shall not be considered by any Court in any proceeding whatsoever. Pending applications, if any, are also closed.