High CourtsDivision Bench(2009) 04 DEL CK 0261

Social Jurist, A Civil Rights Group vs Government of NCT of Delhi and Another

Delhi High Court · Decided on 15 April 2009

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.P. Shah, C.J · Neeraj Kishan Kaul, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) 43 of 2006

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 618 words

Neeraj Kishan Kaul, J.—The present petition was filed in public interest raising issues concerning establishment and running of unauthorized and unrecognized schools in the city of Delhi. It is stated in the present writ petition that unregistered and unrecognized schools are being run in different parts of Delhi and the same had been established and were being run without the permission of the Government and without the recognition of the proper authority under Delhi School Education Act, 1973. It was also alleged in the present petition that most of the schools were ill-equipped and were set up in unsafe buildings and did not have adequate accommodation.

2.

The writ petition was allowed with certain directions on 2nd February, 2008. The Directorate of Education, MCD, NDMC and DDA as also other prescribed authorities were asked to submit an action taken report in the matter within a period of six months from the date of the order and the matter was to be then put up for perusal and orders in Chambers. Thereafter orders were passed from time to time and the Court perused the two action taken reports dated 7th August, 2008 and 12th August, 2008 filed by the MCD and the Directorate of Education respectively. The reports were silent as to what action the respondents proposed to take against the schools that had not applied for recognition and were still continuing to function. The respondents were also directed to indicate that if they decided to close the schools, what arrangements they proposed to make in respect of the students taking education in such schools. Pursuant to Court orders, affidavits were filed.

3.

Mr. Sabharwal, learned Counsel for the MCD had fairly conceded that the report was incomplete and a further survey of unrecognized schools was necessary in order to suggest the action plan for the closure of unauthorized schools and for accommodation of children studying therein in the nearby MCD schools. The matter again came up before the Court on 17th December, 2008 when the MCD as well as the Government of NCT of Delhi were asked to file an additional affidavit to indicate the action plan for implementation of the judgment and in particular how they proposed to stop the functioning of unrecognized schools which have failed to apply for recognition and how they proposed to accommodate the children studying in such schools.

4.

Today, during the course of hearing, it was brought to the notice of the Court that Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No. 21952 of 2008 arising out of the judgment and order dated 8th February, 2008 had been filed in the Hon''ble Supreme Court of India and on 2nd April, 2009, the same came up for hearing when the Hon''ble Supreme Court was pleased to pass the following order:

Delay condoned.

Learned senior counsel appearing for the Director, Education submits that pursuant to the directions of the High Court, a survey was conducted by a Committee and the department is awaiting the Report of the said Committee. He also submits that there are about 1063 unauthorised schools out of which about 478 unauthorised schools have already applied for recognition and survey will continue for a period of another six months.

In view of this, we direct that the schools may not be closed till the Report of the Committee is given and a final decision is taken by the authorities.

Status quo to continue for six months.

The SLP is disposed of accordingly.

5.

It is stated by the counsel for the parties before us that in view of the said order passed by the Hon''ble Supreme Court, nothing further survives in the present petition.

6.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.